Yiddish V/1 declarative clauses in discourse
نویسندگان
چکیده
منابع مشابه
Writing Declarative Specifications for Clauses
Modern satisfiability (SAT) solvers provide an efficient implementation of classical propositional logic. Their input language, however, is based on the conjunctive normal form (CNF) of propositional formulas. To use SAT solver technology in practice, a user must create the input clauses in one way or another. A typical approach is to write a procedural program that generates formulas on the ba...
متن کاملEvidentiality of Discourse Items and Because-Clauses
ASYMMETRY There exists a cross-linguistic asymmetry in availability of discourse items among adjunct clauses between because-clauses on one hand, and temporal clauses and if -clauses on the other (see examples (1) for English obviously , (2) for German ja and (3) for Japanese wa; see Hooper and Thompson 1973, Tenny 2002, Sawada and Larson 2004 among others for the same type of asymmetry with ot...
متن کاملFinite state segmentation of discourse into clauses
The paper presents background and motivation for a processing model that segments discourse into units that are simple, non-nested clauses, prior to the recognition of clause internal phrasal constituents, and experimental results in support of this model. One set of results are derived from a statistical reanalysis of the Swedish empirical data in 18] concerning the linguistic structure of maj...
متن کاملDiscourse accessibility constraints in children’s processing of object relative clauses
Children's poor performance on object relative clauses has been explained in terms of intervention locality. This approach predicts that object relatives with a full DP head and an embedded pronominal subject are easier than object relatives in which both the head noun and the embedded subject are full DPs. This prediction is shared by other accounts formulated to explain processing mechanisms....
متن کاملAppositive Relative Clauses, At-issueness, and Timing in Discourse
It is standardly assumed that there is a distinction between truth-conditional content (e.g. entailment) and non-truth-conditional content (e.g. presupposition and implicature). Another, more recent distinction is made between at-issue content (the “main point” of the utterance) and not-at-issue content (in some sense “secondary” to the main point). Ever growing evidence that those two di...
متن کاملذخیره در منابع من
با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید
ژورنال
عنوان ژورنال: IPrA Papers in Pragmatics
سال: 1990
ISSN: 2406-419X,2406-4246
DOI: 10.1075/iprapip.4.1-2.03min